Your search
Results 4 resources
-
SDG 9 - ‘fostering innovation’ - commits governments to actions to incentivize and support scientific research, the development of new technologies, and innovative entrepreneurship. The ‘adequate, balanced and effective’ protection of intellectual property (IP) is a key element in supporting attainment of this and related SDGs, even though IP is not specifically mentioned in SDG 9. In this chapter, we study the Canadian approach to innovation through the country’s national and provincial innovation and IP strategies. These initiatives generally support the goals of SDG 9, but they do not specifically address the systemic barriers that exist for women inventors and entrepreneurs. Different policy mechanisms are required to achieve gender equity and an inclusive IP and innovation environment. These strategies must fully account for women’s lived experiences and must actively dismantle the structural impediments that prevent these inventors and entrepreneurs from fully participating in the IP system.
-
"Chapter 11: When Intellectual Property Rights Converge – Tracing the Contours and Mapping the Fault Lines ‘Case by Case’ and ‘Law by Law’" published on 28 Nov 2008 by Edward Elgar Publishing.
-
The arguments raised by opponents of parallel importation can be divided into two broad categories: an economic argument relating to the detrimental effect of intra-brand competition and an intellectual property (IP) argument relating to the interpretation of the relevant IP statutes to prohibit parallel importation. As a vehicle for controlling or prohibiting parallel importation it is not at all clear that IP law was specifically intended to address the issue of parallel importation. Statutory protection of IP did not arise out of any concept of natural justice or any related theory underlying property ownership at common law but rather, out of a conscious policy decision on the part of Government. Increased IP protection has become integral to the US and Canada's perceptions of their future economic growth. The law of restitution68 or the development of misappropriation/unfair competition principles have been suggested as viable means of offering some form of protection to right-holders and distributors without broadening the IP monopoly.
Explore
Author / Editor
Resource type
Publication year
-
Between 1900 and 1999
(1)
-
Between 1990 and 1999
(1)
- 1995 (1)
-
Between 1990 and 1999
(1)
-
Between 2000 and 2025
(3)
-
Between 2000 and 2009
(1)
- 2008 (1)
-
Between 2010 and 2019
(1)
- 2017 (1)
-
Between 2020 and 2025
(1)
- 2024 (1)
-
Between 2000 and 2009
(1)