Your search
Results 512 resources
-
This study analyses interviews with frontline service workers employed in agencies in Windsor, Ontario, Canada who work with persons without immigration status. Through these interviews, frontline service workers provided insights into their work with persons without status, including the significant barriers to effective service provision requiring 'covert practices' as part of their work. The interview subjects ultimately conclude that an access without fear (AWF) policy would indeed bolster their efforts to work with persons without status, buttressing claims that an AWF policy can be a useful tool to support the basic needs of persons without status. However, the interviews also raise questions about how the law is understood by frontline service workers and the very real potential that AWF might be yet another unmet promise. Underlying these interviews were also questions of trust and relationship-building that re-emphasise both the need and limitations of policy.
-
This article is about two ideologies. Welfare-consequentialism holds that government should adopt the policies that can rationally be expected to maximise aggregate welfare. Populism holds that society is divided into a pure people and a corrupt elite, and asserts that public policy should express the general will of the people. The responses of world governments to the coronavirus pandemic have clearly illustrated the contrast between these ideologies, and the danger that populist government poses to human wellbeing. The article argues that welfare-consequentialism offers a vaccine for populism. First, it rebuts populism’s claims about who government is for and what it should do. Second, the pessimism and distrust that make people crave populism can be satiated by successful welfare-consequentialist government. Finally, welfare-consequentialism’s sunny narrative of progress can be just as compelling to people as populism’s dark story has proven to be.
-
“Personal plight” is the sector of the legal services industry in which the clients are individuals, and the legal needs arise from disputes. This article proposes that competition among personal plight law firms is suppressed by three demand-side phenomena. First, consumers confront high search costs. Identifying competing law firms willing and able to provide the needed services often requires significant expenditure of temporal and psychological resources. Second, comparable price and quality information about firms is scarce for consumers. Both of these factors impede comparison shopping and reduce competitive pressure on firms. A third competition-suppressing factor is observed in tort legal service markets, where offerings are typically priced on a contingency basis. Contingency fees have relatively low salience to consumers, and this reduces consumers’ willingness to negotiate and comparison-shop on the basis of price. This analysis is supported by the author’s empirical research with Ontario personal plight lawyers as well as the existing literature. The article concludes by suggesting possible consequences of this analysis for regulatory policy.
-
This paper provides a conceptual intervention through an analysis of the myths surrounding agricultural citizenship and migrant work that underlie the temporary foreign worker program in two settler countries: Canada and Israel. The paper offers a brief insight into the ideologies around farm work that informed the colonisation and dispossession of Indigenous peoples and the expropriation of non-citizen labour. It begins with a historical overview of how agriculture was used as a tool of colonisation even as settlers struggled to cultivate Canadian lands because of the seasonal nature and the persistent lack of labour. From the time of Confederation, agriculture began to be intimately tied with immigration policies culminating in the Seasonal Agricultural Worker Program (SAWP) that persists to this day. The paper then expands the analysis to Israel to show how other settler nations have also followed similar ideological and policy trajectories. The paper illustrates how racial capitalism intertwines with settler colonial practices discursively and institutionally through immigration policies.
-
14 — Notes and Comments
Explore
Author / Editor
- Ali Hammoudi (5)
- Anneke Smit (10)
- Annette Demers (7)
- Beverly Jacobs (8)
- Brian Manarin (12)
- Christopher Waters (27)
- Claire Mummé (9)
- Dan Rohde (3)
- Danardo Jones (7)
- Daniel Del Gobbo (14)
- David Tanovich (57)
- Gemma Smyth (19)
- Irina Ceric (10)
- Jasminka Kalajdzic (29)
- Jeff Berryman (32)
- Jillian Rogin (5)
- Joshua Sealy-Harrington (9)
- Kristen Thomasen (6)
- Laverne Jacobs (22)
- Lisa Trabucco (2)
- Margaret Liddle (3)
- Mita Williams (6)
- Muharem Kianieff (9)
- Myra Tawfik (9)
- Noel Semple (30)
- Pascale Chapdelaine (17)
- Paul Ocheje (8)
- Reem Bahdi (18)
- Richard Moon (32)
- Ruth Kuras (3)
- Sara Wharton (7)
- Shanthi E. Senthe (5)
- Sujith Xavier (21)
- Tess Sheldon (21)
- Vasanthi Venkatesh (9)
- Vicki Jay Leung (9)
- Vincent Wong (4)
- Wissam Aoun (10)
Resource type
Publication year
- Between 1900 and 1999 (63)
-
Between 2000 and 2026
(449)
- Between 2000 and 2009 (129)
- Between 2010 and 2019 (189)
- Between 2020 and 2026 (131)