Your search
Results 1,055 resources
-
This chapter identifies the intersecting ways in which Israeli approaches to international law are structured around Cohen's three main modes of denial-factual, interpretive, and implicatory-to silence or deflect responsibility for Palestinian suffering. It argues that international law has fed into a process of denial maintenance in Israel, creating the backdrop against which Israeli leaders deny Palestinian suffering. Israel's attitude towards the use of phosphorus as a military weapon compared with its attitude towards stone throwing is striking. The military court's response appears sincere when it emphasises the great risks posed by Palestinian children and youth with stones. The chapter suggests that international law, with its emphasis on domestic implementation, self-reporting, and shaming proves largely ineffective in states of denial. Cohen observes that interpretive denial, in part because it requires familiarity with law and legal concepts and in part because it suggests concern for human rights, can prove more difficult to counter than literal or factual denial.
-
Using data from a survey of large nonprofits across Canada, this study focuses on the determinants of the range of diversity (defined as the number of different ethnocultural and visible minority groups represented) on boards across the country. The determinants of diversity that the article examines include community, organizational, and general board characteristics as well as board diversity practices. We examine the extent to which these factors are related to an increased range of diversity on the boards. It appears that the diversity of the community that nonprofits operate in and efforts to institutionalize formal diversity-related policies are particularly significant determinants of diversity, although board size and reliance on interorganizational alliances in recruitment of board members also have a small relationship. The implications for theory and practice are examined.
-
Evaluating Ombuds Oversight in the Canadian Access to Information Context: A Theoretical and Empirical Inquiry - 1
-
Corporate and governmental wrongdoing can affect large numbers of people. Such wrongdoing has an institutional victim as well; mass harm exerts enormous pressure on civil justice systems to provide efficient but fair procedures for redress. In this context, settlement of mass disputes is easily understood as a common good. Yet settlements involving hundreds or thousands of claims, often across jurisdictions, raise concerns about the substantive fairness of the compromise reached by lawyers, and the ability of the court system to ensure meaningful oversight. Unburdening the judicial system of mass claims comes at a price; how much rough justice are we prepared to accept? As the contributions to this book illustrate, the difficulty of balancing these competing interests is ubiquitous. Canadian class action settlement practice is no exception. In this chapter, I first explore the realities of this form of litigation, and to some extent debunk the myth that class actions inevitably result in large monetary settlements. I then turn to a brief discussion of the incentives and disincentives to settle large claims, for both plaintiffs’ lawyers and defendants. In Part III, I describe and critique the judicial framework for the approval of proposed settlements.
-
This paper considers the recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision in Jones v Tsige. In this unprecedented case, a bank customer was allowed to sue a bank employee personally for the tort of invasion of privacy after the employee surreptitiously accessed her bank account. The case is significant due to its introduction, for the first time, of an American cause of action under the tort of invasion of privacy. In order to fashion the plaintiff with the personal remedy, however, the Court has failed to consider the application of the Tournier doctrine that has established that banks owe a duty of secrecy to their customers. In so doing, it is argued that the Court has undermined an established tradition of law that provides for a better approach in analyzing the issue from a banking perspective than that used by the Court.
Explore
Author / Editor
- Ali Hammoudi (13)
- Anneke Smit (26)
- Annette Demers (9)
- Beverly Jacobs (31)
- Brian Manarin (12)
- Christopher Fredette (14)
- Christopher Waters (57)
- Claire Mummé (19)
- Dan Rohde (3)
- Danardo Jones (14)
- Daniel Del Gobbo (32)
- David Tanovich (51)
- Gemma Smyth (34)
- Irina Ceric (21)
- Jasminka Kalajdzic (68)
- Jeff Berryman (55)
- Jillian Rogin (7)
- Joanna Noronha (3)
- Joshua Sealy-Harrington (35)
- Kristen Thomasen (21)
- Laverne Jacobs (64)
- Lisa Trabucco (3)
- Margaret Liddle (4)
- Meris Bray (4)
- Mita Williams (8)
- Muharem Kianieff (18)
- Myra Tawfik (20)
- Noel Semple (78)
- Pascale Chapdelaine (37)
- Paul Ocheje (8)
- Reem Bahdi (49)
- Richard Moon (71)
- Ruth Kuras (5)
- Sara Wharton (16)
- Shanthi E. Senthe (8)
- Sujith Xavier (45)
- Sylvia Mcadam (4)
- Tess Sheldon (25)
- Valerie Waboose (4)
- Vasanthi Venkatesh (21)
- Vicki Jay Leung (8)
- Vincent Wong (19)
- Wissam Aoun (25)
Resource type
- Audio Recording (3)
- Blog Post (20)
- Book (82)
- Book Section (138)
- Conference Paper (3)
- Document (5)
- Film (2)
- Journal Article (394)
- Magazine Article (34)
- Newspaper Article (16)
- Preprint (318)
- Report (7)
- Thesis (29)
- Video Recording (4)
Publication year
-
Between 2000 and 2025
- Between 2000 and 2009 (209)
- Between 2010 and 2019 (540)
- Between 2020 and 2025 (306)