Your search
Results 516 resources
-
In this article, the administrative law decisions rendered by the Supreme Court of Canada during the 2004-2005 term are reviewed. These decisions addressed four major issues: i) exclusive and concurrent jurisdiction between competing adjudicative bodies; ii) the right to independent adjudication; iii) standard of review; and iv) expertise and deference. Questions relating to exclusive and concurrent jurisdiction occupied the most significant part of the Supreme Court's administrative law energy during the 2004-2005 term. The author analyzes these decisions on jurisdiction, paying particular attention to the many divides between the members of the Court. She argues that the decisions on jurisdiction ratione material between competing tribunals reflect a contest of two administrative law values that have become central to the Canadian administrative state: expertise and expediency. The Supreme Court's approach, which tends to privilege expediency, may have the effect of denying litigants the opportunity to obtain the most appropriate resolutions to their disputes - resolutions that benefit from the expertise and experience of the tribunals themselves. She also highlights the value of including the individual litigant's view of the dispute in the search for its essential character and possible parameters to the essential character test. Finally, the author discusses the issues related to interpreting legislative intent that arise in the cases concerning the right to independent adjudication and core expertise.
-
Background: Separate lines of research have demonstrated strong associations linking alcohol misuse with major depression on the one hand, and anxiety disorders on the other. In the current study we examined the possible confounding and/or additive effects of co-morbid depression/anxiety in understanding these relationships. Methods: A total of 7195 individuals in Ontario, aged 15–64, were interviewed using the CIDI. Based on lifetime diagnoses, we compared rates of alcohol abuse/dependence in four groups consisting of normal controls, individuals with unipolar major depression but no anxiety disorders, individuals with one or more anxiety disorders without depression, and individuals with co-morbid major depression and anxiety. Age of onset of alcoholism in the four study groups was also compared. Results: In both genders, there were significantly higher rates of alcoholism in all three psychiatric groups relative to controls. In females only, there was also a significantly higher rate of alcoholism in the depressed/anxious group than in the pure anxious group. The age of onset of alcoholism was the same across all four study groups. Limitations: Due to limitations related to sample size, we combined subjects with various anxiety disorders into a single anxiety group and concurrent and sequential co-morbidity were not distinguished. Conclusions: Both gender effects and depression/anxiety co-morbidity may be important considerations in the design and interpretation of studies on alcohol misuse. This may be particularly relevant when considering the strength of the association between alcoholism and anxiety disorders in women. Depression and anxiety do not appear to influence the age of onset of alcoholism. Furthermore, no single temporal pattern of onset was identified in individuals with all three disorders, suggesting no obvious cause-effect relationship among them.
-
Data available from a recent planning project provided an opportunity to examine impairment and service needs of individuals with schizophrenia spectrum diagnoses living in a large board-and-care program. When first implemented, this minimum-support custodial program was assumed to be adequate for discharged long-term inpatients with schizophrenia and other chronic mental illnesses. However, the needs assessments indicated considerable heterogeneity in resident level of impairment. When a validated planning template was applied to assign residents to an appropriate level of care, almost one-quarter were assigned to independent living with minimal support, one-third to community living with intensive support, and 40 percent to residential or inpatient treatment. The authors conclude that this program is not able to meet the varying needs of residents. Despite a common diagnosis, many can function in more independent settings, while others need more treatment and rehabilitation than they are currently provided.
-
N/A
Explore
Author / Editor
- Ali Hammoudi (5)
- Anneke Smit (10)
- Annette Demers (7)
- Beverly Jacobs (8)
- Brian Manarin (12)
- Christopher Waters (27)
- Claire Mummé (9)
- Dan Rohde (3)
- Danardo Jones (7)
- Daniel Del Gobbo (14)
- David Tanovich (57)
- Gemma Smyth (19)
- Irina Ceric (10)
- Jasminka Kalajdzic (29)
- Jeff Berryman (32)
- Jillian Rogin (5)
- Joshua Sealy-Harrington (9)
- Kristen Thomasen (7)
- Laverne Jacobs (22)
- Lisa Trabucco (2)
- Margaret Liddle (3)
- Mita Williams (6)
- Muharem Kianieff (9)
- Myra Tawfik (9)
- Noel Semple (30)
- Pascale Chapdelaine (17)
- Paul Ocheje (8)
- Reem Bahdi (18)
- Richard Moon (32)
- Ruth Kuras (3)
- Sara Wharton (7)
- Shanthi E. Senthe (6)
- Sujith Xavier (21)
- Tess Sheldon (21)
- Vasanthi Venkatesh (10)
- Vicki Jay Leung (9)
- Vincent Wong (4)
- Wissam Aoun (10)
Resource type
Publication year
- Between 1900 and 1999 (63)
-
Between 2000 and 2026
(453)
- Between 2000 and 2009 (129)
- Between 2010 and 2019 (189)
- Between 2020 and 2026 (135)