Legal Billy Club

Resource type
Authors/contributors
Title
Legal Billy Club
Abstract
This article centers on the profound discrepancy between efforts by First Nations to obtain injunctions against industry and the state versus the far more successful record of corporations and governments seeking to obtain injunctions against First Nations. We examine how the common law test for injunctions in struggles over lands and resources leads to these results. We begin by tracking the history of injunctions in the Aboriginal law context, especially the development of s 35(1) jurisprudence, which ironically deprived First Nations of access to injunctions, despite an earlier period of successful defence of Indigenous land rights using this legal tool. We then focus on the doctrinal and political function of the “public interest” consideration in injunction cases, positioning this concept within a broader political economy framework. Finally, we turn to the origins of the injunction as an equitable remedy and argue that the current imbalance in injunction success rates ought to be understood through a re-examination of equity within a broader historical trajectory of settler-colonial legality. We conclude that the heavy lifting done by notions of ‘public interest’ both relies on and obscures the circumvention and exclusion of Aboriginal treaty and constitutional rights from the law of injunctions and constitutes a de facto resolution of Aboriginal land rights in Canada. Finally, we ask what place, if any, exists in injunction jurisprudence for Indigenous law and governance.
Publication
TMU Law Review
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
7-31
Date
August 11, 2023
Language
en
Accessed
8/28/24, 5:20 PM
Extra
(2023) 1:1 TMU L Rev 7
Citation
Pasternak, S., & Ceric, I. (2023). Legal Billy Club. TMU Law Review, 1(1), 7–31. https://www.tmulawreview.com/current-issue/legal-billy-club
Author / Editor