The eye of the beholder: professional opinions about the best interests of a child

Resource type
Author/contributor
Title
The eye of the beholder: professional opinions about the best interests of a child
Abstract
When parents separate and cannot agree about parenting arrangements for their children, a state-authorized neutral party must resolve the dispute. Two groups of neutral professionals perform this function in many western jurisdictions. The first group is judges, who are entrusted with the ultimate decision-making authority. The second group is custody and access assessors, who are generally psychologists, psychiatrists, or social workers. This thesis compares the processes by which these two groups of professionals make the decisions, and analyzes the interface between them. It then presents the results of empirical research about the extent to which Ontario judges accept custody and access recommendations from social worker assessors employed by Ontario's Office of the Children's Lawyer. The central finding was that the judges and assessors agreed only about half of the time. Possible explanations for this finding are explored, and its significance is analyzed in the context of the existing literature.
University
York University,
Date
2009
Language
eng
Short Title
The eye of the beholder
Extra
Book Title: The eye of the beholder : professional opinions about the best interests of a child
Citation
Semple, N. (2009). The eye of the beholder: professional opinions about the best interests of a child. York University,.
Author / Editor