'Bridging the Clinical-Doctrinal Divide: Clinician and Student Views of Teaching and Learning in Clinical Legal Programs'
Resource type
Author/contributor
- Smyth, Gemma E. (Author)
Title
'Bridging the Clinical-Doctrinal Divide: Clinician and Student Views of Teaching and Learning in Clinical Legal Programs'
Abstract
The initial purpose of this study was to examine the educational needs and perceptions of students and clinicians in Canadian legal clinics. The author conducted a literature review of leading legal educational materials in Canada and the United Status focusing on required or preferred competencies for law students. The author then interviewed law students, clinicians, social workers, and community legal workers, all of whom were working or studying at law school-affiliated legal clinics. Interview subjects were asked a series of questions about their learning experiences in hopes of informing the creation of teaching and learning materials. The data revealed an under-reliance on the affective elements of teaching, learning and practice in both existing literature and current teaching practices. The data also revealed deep structural divides between doctrinal and clinical teaching and learning approaches. Without further integration, students and, ultimately, communities and clients will not reap the benefits of an integrated curriculum.
Genre
SSRN Scholarly Paper
Archive ID
2792204
Place
Rochester, NY
Date
2016-05-20
Accessed
9/27/23, 1:44 AM
Short Title
'Bridging the Clinical-Doctrinal Divide
Language
en
Library Catalog
Social Science Research Network
Citation
Smyth, G. E. (2016). “Bridging the Clinical-Doctrinal Divide: Clinician and Student Views of Teaching and Learning in Clinical Legal Programs” (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 2792204). https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2792204
Author / Editor
Link to this record