A New Life for Section 13 of the CHRA?
Resource type
Author/contributor
- Moon, Richard (Author)
Title
A New Life for Section 13 of the CHRA?
Abstract
The Online Harms Bill (Bill C-63) imposed on larger social media platforms a “duty to act responsibly,” which rested on a recognition that traditional legal responses were no longer effective in addressing hate speech and other forms of unlawful expression when they occur online. This recognition, however, made it all the more surprising that the Bill also included an amendment to the Canadian Human Rights Act (CHRA), adding a prohibition on online hate speech. This ban was a slightly revised version of a provision — section 13 of the CHRA — that had been repealed by the federal government in 2014. The proposed revisions to the earlier CHRA ban on hate speech addressed some of the concerns raised about the earlier version of the section and that led to its repeal, but fail to account for the fact that the communication landscape has changed dramatically since 2014. In this new landscape, traditional legal responses, including human rights code restrictions, are simply too slow and cumbersome to respond effectively to the problem of online hate speech.
Publication
Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel
Date
2026-03-30
Volume
34
Issue
4
Pages
65-72
DOI
Accessed
5/3/26, 7:30 PM
ISSN
1927-4165
Language
en
Library Catalog
journals.library.ualberta.ca
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Richard Moon
Citation
Moon, R. (2026). A New Life for Section 13 of the CHRA? Constitutional Forum / Forum Constitutionnel, 34(4), 65–72. https://doi.org/10.21991/cf29516
Author / Editor
Link to this record