Comment on R v K(A): Carding, Racial Profiling and Police Perjury

Resource type
Authors/contributors
Title
Comment on R v K(A): Carding, Racial Profiling and Police Perjury
Abstract
The issue of police carding has received very little judicial attention in Canadian cases. In this case, the trial judge found that the carding of the accused was unconstitutional and constituted racial profiling. The trial judge also found that the police officer's testimony involved "several fabrications ... fed to the court..." It is yet another recent judicial finding of police perjury involving the Toronto Police Service.
Genre
SSRN Scholarly Paper
Archive ID
2741280
Place
Rochester, NY
Date
2016-03-04
Accessed
9/29/23, 5:12 PM
Short Title
Comment on R v K(A)
Language
en
Library Catalog
Social Science Research Network
Citation
Tanovich, D. M., & Stuart, D. R. (2016). Comment on R v K(A): Carding, Racial Profiling and Police Perjury (SSRN Scholarly Paper 2741280). https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2741280
Author / Editor