Full bibliography

The Law Society of BC v. Trinity Western University: Complicated Answers to a Simple Question

Resource type
Author/contributor
Title
The Law Society of BC v. Trinity Western University: Complicated Answers to a Simple Question
Abstract
This paper examines the recent Supreme Court of Canada judgment in LSBC v. TWU, in which the court upheld the decision of the BC law society not to accredit a law program proposed by an Evangelical Christian university. The paper argues that the task for the courts in this and other religious freedom cases is not to balance competing civic and religious interests but is instead to mark the boundary between the spheres of civic and spiritual life. More particularly, in this case, the issue was whether TWU (in applying to operate an accredited law program) should be viewed as a private religious institution that is free to govern itself according to its own norms, or whether, because its actions directly impact outsiders to the religious group, it should be viewed as performing a public role and therefore subject to non-discrimination and other civic norms. The different judgments in the case begin with different assumptions about the public/private character of TWU (or at least its proposed law program) and so never really address the key issue and never really engage with each other. The paper argues that because admission to law school continues to be a significant barrier to entry into the legal profession in Canada, TWU’s admission decisions will have an impact on non-members. The law society, therefore, was justified in requiring TWU to conform to non-discrimination norms as a condition of accreditation.
Genre
SSRN Scholarly Paper
Archive ID
3501640
Place
Rochester, NY
Date
2019-07-30
Accessed
9/10/23, 8:16 PM
Short Title
The Law Society of BC v. Trinity Western University
Language
en
Library Catalog
Social Science Research Network
Citation
Moon, R. (2019). The Law Society of BC v. Trinity Western University: Complicated Answers to a Simple Question (SSRN Scholarly Paper 3501640). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3501640
Author / Editor