Your search
In authors or contributors
Nationalist Backlash to Anti-Racist Education: A Transnational Blueprint for Academic Unfreedom
Resource type
Authors/contributors
- Wong, Vincent (Author)
- Mégret, Frédéric (Editor)
- Ramanujam, Nandini (Editor)
Title
Nationalist Backlash to Anti-Racist Education: A Transnational Blueprint for Academic Unfreedom
Abstract
In a global era marked by surging racial nationalism and penal populism , anti-racist and decolonial research, education, and training has been under increasing threat in academia across the world. Popular use of the universalizing language of liberal internationalism as the dominant frame in discussing these developments leaves gaps in our understanding as to what areas of academic freedom are under the greatest threat, why they are under threat, what levers of sanction and discipline are used to suppress certain areas, and for what ends. Such a frame risks contributing to overly abstracted conceptualizations of academic freedom (and unfreedom) that are unmoored from the realities of how power operates in educational institutions and attendant maldistributions of who can in fact claim and be protected by academic freedom and who cannot.In this article, I put into conversation three very different jurisdictional contexts where nationalist backlash to, and suppression of, anti-racist and decolonial education and scholarship is occurring. Specifically, it examines American anti-Critical Race Theory (CRT) campaigns, Chinese suppression of scholarship critical of its ongoing colonial suppression of non-Han native peoples in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region (XUAR), and Israeli suppression of scholarship critical of its ongoing occupation of Palestinian territories through the case study of the ‘Spiro scandal’ at the University of Toronto (UofT) Faculty of Law. No good politics of academic freedom can emerge without centering an analysis of broader societal power and subordination. This is particularly true in the areas of national security and anti-racism, which form both distinct grounds for legal and political intervention in academic freedom. A national security threat engages certain types of legal grounds, particularly domestically (e.g. carceral responses to perceived counterterrorism, separatism, and extremism threats) while anti-racism justifies other types of intervention (e.g. civil rights complaints, removing of curriculum, firings, cutting funding) and can operate powerfully on a transnational level as well. I highlight three common elements in a transnational blueprint that can be observed in the creation, justification, and operation of selective nationalist attacks on academic freedom in anti-racist and decolonial education. My highlighting of these common elements are not meant to suggest any sort of equivalence between their operation, historical context, and/or relative severity, but rather to advance our collective understanding of the distributive nature of academic freedom politics and its relationship to power, race, and colonialism. Unpacking these campaigns transnationally complicates and unsettles the dichotomy between authoritarian and liberal populist censorship, giving us a more nuanced foundation by which to protect academic freedom and knowledge production in the service of racial justice and collective liberation.
Book Title
Academic Freedom in a Plural World: Global Critical Perspectives
Place
S.l.
Publisher
CENTRAL EUROPEAN UNIVERSI
Date
2024
Language
eng
ISBN
978-963-386-653-5
Library Catalog
Open WorldCat
Extra
OCLC: 1395068433
Citation
Wong, V. (2024). Nationalist Backlash to Anti-Racist Education: A Transnational Blueprint for Academic Unfreedom. In F. Mégret & N. Ramanujam (Eds.), Academic Freedom in a Plural World: Global Critical Perspectives. CENTRAL EUROPEAN UNIVERSI. https://ceupress.com/book/academic-freedom-plural-world
Author / Editor
Link to this record