Your search
Results 435 resources
-
Osgoode Hall Law School, York University’s Challenging Conventions! Speaker Series organized Re-Igniting Critical Race: A Symposium on Contemporary Accounts of Racialization in Canada on November 2, 2012. The symposium sought to explore critical race theory and its praxis within the Canadian legal academy by inviting emerging scholars and practitioners to engage with the scholarship of Professor Patricia Williams.
-
Global Legal Pluralism: A Jurisprudence of Law Beyond Borders (GLP) by Paul Schiff Berman is a legal pluralist’s contribution to the study of local and global regulation. In a tour de force, Berman articulates clear and concise arguments in support of adopting a pluralist lens (coined as a cosmopolitan pluralist perspective). He magnificently traverses the multiple and complex bodies of literature that seek to understand the various inchoate regulatory regimes, actors, norms, and processes,1 to simply state that we must harness the benefits of the overlapping legal authorities. The overlapping legal authorities for Berman produce legal hybridity, which is a product of globalization(s).2
-
Professor Ladeur argues that administrative law's postmodernism (and by extension Global Administrative Law) necessitates that we move beyond relying on ideas of delegation, accountability and legitimacy. Global Governance, particularly Global Administrative Law and Global Constitutionalism, should try to adapt and experiment with the changing nature of the postmodern legality and support the creation of norms that will adapt to the complexities of globalisation. Ladeur's contestation, similar to GAL's propositions, can be challenged. By taking the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, a significant contributor to the field of international criminal law, as an example, it is suggested that the creation of networks that Ladeur makes visible may not account for ‘regulatory capture’. This paper will argue that from the outside, the proliferation of networks may suggest that spontaneous accountability is possible. A closer look, however, drawing on anthropological insights from the ICTR, reveals that international institutions are susceptible to capture by special interests. Furthermore, there are two central themes that animate the response to Professor Ladeur: the political nature of international institutions and the history of international law, and the role of institutions in this history.
Explore
Author / Editor
- Ali Hammoudi (5)
- Anneke Smit (8)
- Annette Demers (3)
- Beverly Jacobs (7)
- Brian Manarin (12)
- Christopher Waters (28)
- Claire Mummé (9)
- Dan Rohde (2)
- Danardo Jones (9)
- Daniel Del Gobbo (11)
- David Tanovich (15)
- Gemma Smyth (17)
- Irina Ceric (10)
- Jasminka Kalajdzic (28)
- Jeff Berryman (32)
- Jillian Rogin (5)
- Joshua Sealy-Harrington (6)
- Kristen Thomasen (2)
- Laverne Jacobs (18)
- Lisa Trabucco (2)
- Margaret Liddle (3)
- Mita Williams (6)
- Muharem Kianieff (10)
- Myra Tawfik (9)
- Noel Semple (26)
- Pascale Chapdelaine (17)
- Paul Ocheje (8)
- Reem Bahdi (18)
- Richard Moon (31)
- Ruth Kuras (3)
- Sara Wharton (6)
- Shanthi E. Senthe (5)
- Sujith Xavier (22)
- Tess Sheldon (13)
- Vasanthi Venkatesh (9)
- Vicki Jay Leung (9)
- Vincent Wong (4)
- Wissam Aoun (9)
Resource type
Publication year
- Between 1900 and 1999 (42)
-
Between 2000 and 2025
(393)
- Between 2000 and 2009 (103)
- Between 2010 and 2019 (176)
- Between 2020 and 2025 (114)